Dear viewer, these subtitles were generated by a machine via the service Trint and therefore are (very) buggy. If you are capable, please help us to create good quality subtitles: https://c3subtitles.de/talk/167 Thanks!
Today with us here, we have Albuquerque's
going to talk about anonymity and
privacy in public spaces and on the
internet.
And she's going to do that by a
constructive proof.
Abubakar first appeared at
the Euro 2012 at Sea Bass,
and she has won the last two hacker
Jeopardy's at the Chaos Communication
Congress.
And so please welcome.
Hello, welcome.
I did not only managed to win the Hacker
Jeopardy this year, it was also
I won the bingo, I had five in a row
and Hacker Jeopardy.
I'm really sorry about the delay
now, but we're having some trouble.
We can't use some trackpad,
but then I can't take off my gloves
because I have nothing left
to compare.
So
we need assistance.
That would be nice.
Thank you.
So my talk is going to be
about anonymity and privacy in public
space and on the internet.
And of course, this is not really
anonymity. This is, of course, a
pseudonym.
Alan Walker is an avatar.
And first, I would like to to
start with a disclaimer.
So this is,
of course, parody.
Please don't throw any stones.
And of course, I'm also aware that I'm
not wearing a burka, but a
niqab,
this kind of process is called niqab.
And to explain the term
and work on
this is the tinfoil burka.
So you might
be familiar with the concept of tinfoil
hats.
This is a derogatory term, derogatory
term for people who are concerned
about privacy
and information privacy
and are friendly.
Herod already talked about
the chuckle ordinance, or the
German digital natives
have a debate between the
people fighting for privacy and the right
for information privacy
and those who will call it a fucking.
They fight for people's privacy because
they think that privacy is outdated and
we would all have a better life
if nobody had any privacy at all.
So this is actually a point
the parody on a tinfoil hat.
And we decided
to well, I decided to wear
a niqab and not a burqa, because
this is kind of an inversion of the sense
of by by the way, anonymity
allows company
and well
to cite Oscar Wilde
man, at least himself when
he talks and his own person give them a
mosque and he will tell you the truth.
I don't know if that's true, but
on the internet, nobody knows that I'm a
dog.
Oh, sorry.
Well, um,
so this
notion has cringed a bit changed
a bit. Now, people on the internet
do know that you a dog.
And I think
this.
Well, that seems to be
company.
So
I don't know. What
are you, Alan Walker?
I seem to be a new book, huh?
And I seem not to be a dog, and I
hope that nothing indicates
that I'm a different book, though
we have an apparent change in size
between the two of us.
But this illustrates
the underdog then,
but we're not coming.
And this goes to illustrate that
anonymity loves company that you need to
be more than one to have privacy.
So whenever you give yourself a mask,
you'll cover the bit and you'll cover
something towards others.
But as we just saw in the comic fans,
it was people trying to invade the
privacy, no matter what you do.
And we would like to give an
analogy to to the internet.
So some of you might have seen the talk
by Jacob Appelbaum and Roger Dingle's
line about Tor,
which is one concept of what we call a
privacy enhancing technology
because it strips away information about
you and provides
privacy to a certain degree.
And there's four different aspects of
doing internet access
and inside communication.
You'll have different tools that strip
away some of the information, some of the
metadata.
But the technology in this case strip
away information about our
identities.
I guess.
I guess so.
But of course, the question is what
is the analogy?
So
we'll will have
differences. We have anonymity and
student committee and
some tools provide sort of limiting
like remodelers in the 1990s
and unpin at fee provided you with an
address that was a pseudonym, but
that pseudonym could always be attributed
towards you in the event that the
correlation register would be taken
away as it had been done due to
the Church of Scientology.
And so what we strive for is anonymity,
but it's always a goal and we're never
going to be perfect.
But at least in technical matters, we can
do so on the internet. We have tools
where we strive to reach anonymity.
But what about away from keyboard?
What about in real life, as the others
call it,
how can you participate in a social event
just as Chaos Communication Congress
anonymously?
And of course, there's people who have
found an answer out
there, you'll all know Anonymous
who go around in Guy Fawkes masks
and are anonymous.
But the problem is it's still a
relatively small group of people
that have a common set of values that you
can attribute to.
So what do you do? You try to spread the
meme, right?
And all of a sudden you see people in
parliament wearing masks, wearing Guy
Fawkes masks, trying to be anonymous.
But that's the people in power already.
And the question is, furthermore,
what is the basis for trying
to strip away anonymity?
What is the wish of the state
to take away our anonymity?
And there's different aspects, really.
One that we should talk about talking
about burqas or niqabs
is lice. ISM is the way to
try and separate the state and religion.
The French secularity law.
But in fact, it
made it a criminal act to wear a burqa
in public in France.
And we have the same in Germany.
There's a great German.
What we have found no translation into
the English language. This seems not to
be a concept known to people in the
English world.
It's a ban on wearing face coverings.
It's called pheromones for board.
You're not allowed to wear
a burqa or a mask at a demonstration
because the state says we have
a right to know who you are if you
want to protest.
And so what is the way of doing this?
We tried to do this interventionist art
and show that we're at a conference
and you can be anonymous and you can win
prizes and game shows,
but anonymity comes with cost.
It's unbelievably warm in here, for
instance.
Yeah, not very practical.
This government can't use my track card.
I'm sweating like, hell, I'm thirsty.
And at the moment somebody tries to
address you and they will come and say, I
love BookCon, but
whom do they mean?
Me, you you.
I'm on my new book,
so we'll face a lot of practical problems
that we don't know how to address if we
strip away identifying information
that really helps us in our everyday
social interactions and transactions to
make clear who you are
because
this is an issue of losing
control. Obviously, someone has
entered my stage and is giving
my talk.
Same thing with with anonymous, anybody
can be anonymous and claim to
to be the official spokesperson.
Wait, what? I am the official
spokesperson for Anonymous.
No, for other Burka.
Who are you?
Maybe I should
find my way as we see anonymity, allows
companies to bring back and hammer back
to the message.
You'll need to be anonymous, to be
anonymous, you need to have company,
but it's hard to distinguish between
those who are anonymous, and that's
good for a number of
your own hourly workers.
And let's be hundreds of us
now.
Let's be hundreds and solve the
problems. So what are the
problems? How can we build trust
among people who are anonymous on the
internet and away from keyboard?
Are you finished?
Is this my talk?
Any questions?
Well, everybody seems to be so,
yeah, I guess
you already did, but you know, please
thank the shared Avatar
Olu worker again for the dog.